But you're left with, is that person
going to be a connection for me? Or are
they going to be a pain in the ass? Are
they just nice and I never get anything
right here? Or that ending felt like
maybe they were wounded by something I
said or did or are they going to become
a nightmare for me. So that's the
hypothetical that we'll come back to. So
let's talk about how to figure out who
is a safe person and who is not a safe
person for us. That's tricky to figure
out if you come from childhood trauma.
So, I'm going to give you a hypothetical
here, and it's a little bit long, so
stay with me. Picture you're at a new
job, and then in the middle of your
first day, it's generally pretty
stressful. An employee comes over to you
to introduce themselves and welcome you
in. They make direct eye contact with
you, and they seem pretty interested in
you. They are personable and they're
mostly expressing like, "Welcome to our
wacky team here kind of stuff." And
there's kind of a script like they're
saying, "We're low-key dysfunctional
land of misfit toys here. You'll see
that in action. We're all living the
dream, right?" And they have a little
bit of some nervous laughter going on as
they're expressing that. And you wonder
if they are a little bit keyed up or
intense, or is it because maybe you're
just nervous, but your chest feels a
little bit tight from all that focus on
you, and you feel a little bit on the
spot, which is tricky for us. But you're
thinking you always seem to get people
wrong. Maybe they're just being nice.
But a part of you doesn't like their
focus on you. It feels a little extra,
like this person is selling you on a job
that you've already accepted. Being
extra is probably now an outdated term,
but I love to use it because it kind of
spells out the context of what it's like
when someone's a little bit triggered.
It just means that there's pretense in
the person. They might be hiding
something. They maybe have a little bit
of a motive or maybe they're acting out
unconsciously, which is usually that
this coworker seems a little bit of
themselves in an unsure way. I'm going
to repeat that. They seem sure of
themselves in an unsure way. And maybe
they have had to psych themselves into
being confident instead of being that
naturally. That's not always bad, but
it's just more data for you in this
moment. They start telling you how long
they've been there, what they do, if you
ever need anything, yada yada yada.
They're your person for that, and they
happen to love it here in this job, by
the way. Are they a little bit needy or
just friendly and welcoming? But do you
struggle maybe with people's motives
like I did in the wayback? But is this
just that you hate small talk? that they
ask you about your last work adventure
and you still feel kind of on the spot
because you hated your last job and you
don't really know what to say or speak
from that from the place of just factual
reality and they offer to help you even
as far as wanting to show you the
vending machines downstairs or wait
maybe get a better chair for your cube
and then the conversation kind of winds
down and this is important. Then they
end the conversation kind of abruptly.
their face goes a little bit flat or
they're might become a little bit
worried or sad or something and you
wonder if you did something. Was that
who the person was or was that a
performance or even a failed performance
and you're honestly just like a little
bit triggered by all this and again in
that place of like was it me or was it
them WTF kind of a thing but you're left
with is that person going to be a
connection for me or are they going to
be a pain in the ass? Are they just nice
and I never get anything right here? Or
that ending felt like maybe they were
wounded by something I said or did or
are they going to become a nightmare for
me? So that's the hypothetical that
we'll come back to. And then a question
for you that I have is, have you ever
had a friend, someone in your life that
could accurately with precision flat out
in the moment decide immediately who was
crazy and who was actually a safe
person? They didn't maybe wrestle with
themselves about being mean. They could
say no thank you or even f that when an
unsafe person kind of swaggers into
their life like at a social gathering or
on the street or whatever. That friend
maybe has an intact protective radar
system that they are not afraid to use.
Maybe that friend didn't grow up in the
same kind of trauma that you did. Here's
the biggest point of this video that
separates a friend like I'm mentioning
from maybe a childhood trauma survivor
like I was when I started out. They are
more self-protective and discerning
instead of being wide open to people.
That was me. I was so wide open to
people which wasn't good. And they also
allow for a process. They trust their
gut. They're not mean. They're just
actually in control. So now let's talk
about a little bit of this hypothetical
in relation to that friend something
called the broken radar system. I
believe that everybody has intuition I
think but for many of us that system
which I call like radar is diminished or
offline. The radar that helps us check
our gut about who is safe who are not
that's a compromised system for most of
us. And for childhood trauma our radar
system is there but it's offline because
we have a deficit in our circuitry. If
you're familiar with computers, there's
something called CPU. And our radar
system is way down in the list of open
applications because something big up
top of the list is taking up like 80% of
the computer's memory and functioning.
You struggle to get memory and power
kind of going when it comes to this
radar. It's there again, but it's just
greatly diminished. There's the things
that are really taking up all the CPU
are shame, self-doubt, our attachment
wounds, maybe some magical thinking. And
all those trauma symptoms are taking up
like 90% of your functioning and your
body CPU and overriding that radar and
that gets buried underneath and that's
fixable, which is the point of this
video. And to continue, things are so
loud because of those things up top,
shame, self-doubt, attachment wounds.
There isn't enough energy or space for
that radar to function properly and take
priority in these moments. Another goofy
analogy that I have, it's like how Zoom
recently changed and now Zoom has
hijacked all of my audio preferences on
my computer. If I want to use music
software, Zoom's audio preferences just
bust into that software and says, "Oh,
you want to use Zoom? Well, we'll put
the mic on Zoom instead of your music
software, overriding that music program
that I want to use." And then I lose
this mic connection. So, something is
overtaking how I want to function.
Except the Kool-Aid Man would have been
things like my people pleasing or my
dissociation or my fear of being mean.
All of that takes over and there I am
again engaging with someone I really
don't want to be engaging with. So
something is overriding your amazing
intuition that you were born with. And
that override is either trauma or maybe
it's zoom to make to make a joke. But
some kind of code is overriding the code
you want to use. You want to use our
radar because that assesses and tracks
and picks up on red flags in other
people. It says, is that a friend or a
foe? Or if you're like me, before I did
any of my trauma work, my system wasn't
really working and it labeled everybody
as a friend, which wasn't true. Or you
might be someone who labels everyone as
a foe, which also isn't true. It can
kind of go both ways. So, back to that
rant and back to this co-orker
hypothetical that I talked about about
that coworker. I'd love to hear from you
right now before we go further in the
video about what do you think about
that? This is almost like an episode of
Blues Clues where I'm like, "What you
guys? Is there a clue back there? What
are you guys saying about is there a red
flag with that coworker's behavior?"
Like, "Oh, it's a clue. It's a red flag
under my thing there." And for you, was
it a red flag in that example? Was there
a yellow flag in that hypothetical? Was
there even a green flag? Or did I not
give you enough information about this
person yet? Hold on to that because
that's going to be a tool that we come
back later. If we were experiencing a
new coworker like that, would your radar
system be working correctly for you?
Would shame or self-doubt or
dissociation or even rage, something
like sort of burying your radar system
because those symptoms are just so flat
out and loud. If you don't know me, I'm
Patrick Tian. I'm a childhood trauma
educator. I run a healing membership
helping people move past just talking
about childhood trauma and actually
doing something about it. You can check
out from the bubble up here or up here
cuz when I'm talking I'm nervous and I
can never tell what that bubble is. In
that example of the new coworker, they
for me kind of exhibit this main
framework that we're going to talk about
around deciding who is a safe person.
And that framework is authenticity.
We're going to use a lot of that word in
this framework. For me, simply put, if I
was experiencing a person like that, I
don't have enough information, but I
would be cautious around how they ended
the conversation. That would have been
kind of a clue for me or a red flag
about deciding about yellow flag, green
flag, red flag. Why did they walk away
feeling like they failed or I failed
them? That would be my main concern. Did
they walk away frustrated that I wasn't
more engaging? Did they fail or did I
fail? And at this point in my life, I'm
a pretty good judge of character. And
how it ended tells me that their inner
child was in play in some way. And they
either went to a shame place or they
were pissed that I didn't react the way
that they wanted me to react. Maybe that
was like reacting, oh, I'm so thankful
or whatever when I'm just like, okay,
you know. Um, and because I was put on
the spot a little bit. I wasn't a jerk
in this hypothetical. Neither were they
really. It was just kind of awkward. I'm
not saying that coworker is bad or
unsafe. In some ways, we can decide that
way too fast. But again, I would be
taking in the data of how they ended the
conversation and why the land of misfit
toys kind of stuff. Did they have a
motive about making this environment to
seem more safe than it actually is? You
know, does that remind you of your
family in any way? Like, well, we're
just a big old happy dysfunctional
family blob here. You know what I mean?
That's the place that I would be a
little bit like, ew. You know, so up top
that coworker is saying, "I'm sorry, the
mic's in the way." Um, up top, this
coworker is saying, "I'm here for you.
I'm helpful. Let's feel good right now."
But underneath on the bottom, what came
out in ending the conversation was
something like, "Why didn't that work
with that new hire?" That's what I would
be kind of suspicious of. Kind of like a
motive. My now working radar system in
my life would be telling me that maybe
they had a little motive. The welcoming
wasn't really that authentic. Did they
want to be seen a certain way or did
they generally want me to feel seen and
welcome? I would have to know more data
as I continue to work there and I got to
know everybody and that person which is
a super important thing. And I know I'm
talking this to death. It'd be different
if I gave you a really hardcore example
that the person made inappropriate jokes
or they try to hit on you. I'm giving
you a vague hypothetical on purpose.
When what is said up top doesn't match
the bottom points to problems in
authenticity. Authenticity is kind of
tricky to define. Authenticity defined
per psych today is the degree to which
an individual's actions, behaviors, and
expressions are aligned with their true
intentional values, beliefs, and
emotions. It involves high
self-awareness, honest self-expression,
and the ability to act in accordance
with one's core self. I'm reading this
from the thing. Rather than acting to
please others or conform to external
pressures. That was a lot. That makes
sense to me. But authenticity involves
how much a person can tolerate being
vulnerable. Why is that important to me?
Vulnerability is nourishing in our
relationships because we are taking a
risk and signaling that we can handle
ourselves and handle our own humanity
and the humanity of others. So, who out
there has ever been with someone who was
passive aggressive and in a low-grade
conflict, they're like, "It's fine. I'll
just do it. It's fine." Maybe you've
been that person. It's like an example
of inauthenticity. They're not taking
the risk in that conflict. This person
to say, "I'm actually kind of frustrated
and I'm tired." We talked about this
this morning that you said you would run
that errand and I don't want to put you
out, but I don't have the energy to do
more today. I don't have much left in
the tank. That is a much more authentic
and human expression and seeing the
humanity in others rather than going
like it's fine. It's fine. You know,
like we learn that from our families.
Saying it's fine and then passive
aggressively might mean that you can't
take the risk of the vulnerability that
I just modeled of disappointing someone
or having them be mad at you. So, it's
inauthentic. It's not real. It's not
vulnerable. I know that sounds like
maybe you're a mess when it's just kind
of like taking honest risks. That's what
vulnerability is. Now, what if that
coworker, and this is kind of out there,
kind of said, "Hey, I realize I'm
probably coming on a little strong. I
just remember how much my first day kind
of sucked here. So, I'm probably
overcompensating. I can just let you
breathe now and go back to my cube.
We'll talk later. That's so much more
safer to me. I know that that sounds
weird, but that's more authentic.
Inauthenticity is an inability to be
real. And when we follow that down a
little bit more, not being real is to
maybe cover up a vulnerability. Follow
that down again. What's underneath
vulnerability is unconscious pain.
lead that back up to the top of what
what I just said is someone with
unconscious pain might be a car without
a driver. That's what is a clue about
safe people versus unsafe people. Maybe
the coworker was being unconsciously
social and extra and not in tune at all
with their childhood wounds and don't
know if they're trying to bond too
quickly to a stranger or impress them.
They just walked away from you going
like, "What's their problem? What's her
problem? What's his problem? Not maybe I
was a little bit too much there.
Reflective. Sometimes we're too
reflective, but some people are just not
reflective at all. Think about the most
damaging person in your life. Are they a
car without a driver? Do you have a
parent like that, a sibling like that?
An ex like that? Like they aren't aware
that they're even driving? Like they're
not awake or aware of their emotions or
their motives in life. Cars without a
driver aren't really trying to hit you.
or maybe they are, but because they
aren't steering their own triggers, but
you're the one who still ends up hurt or
in the hospital or something like that.
And driverless cars, i.e. unsafe people
are like, "What? You jumped in front of
me. I was just doing my thing." You
know, they're not have a lot of
accountability either. Safety just isn't
about niceness. It's about whether or
not a person is actually in the driver's
seat of their own life knowing what
they're doing. And you might be kind of
wondering, well, don't manipulators know
what they're doing? Yes, technically,
but they're not aware of their impact of
that manipulation. So, it's just like
another version of a car without a
driver. Cars without drivers are just
like abusive parents who don't know
their impact on you or don't know what
their job is in terms of being a parent
and what that entails. They're just kind
of cosplaying but not aware that they're
cosplaying. For me, an inauthentic
person might be showing signs that
they're not safe and in the following
three ways. They might be going too fast
to solidify a bond with you. They might
be hiding their feelings or hiding big
issues, hiding emotive instead of
authentically wanting to make a
connection. Quality of relational style.
Are they intense? Are they trying to be
overly helpful, overly generous, overly
negative with you, or even provocative?
So, in figuring out who is safe or not,
most people will tell you to look for a
list of like 50 red flags. When I'm
going to be telling you look for the ick
in your body and think inauthenticity
rhymes with icky, there's always a part
of you that is going to feel ick. It's
just disgust. It's a one of the natural
human emotions that many childhood
trauma survivors are disconnected from.
There's a video that I did on that that
I'll put in the description of this
about like basic human emotions related
to childhood trauma. But sometimes we're
not connected to disgust or ickiness
enough and that's going to get us into a
lot of trouble. I know it got me into
trouble. So does the person in question
feel extra to you? Like are they selling
you on something like how caring or
chill or how great they are or how much
they're seeing you? It's a little bit
like love bombing. And you don't need a
list of 50 red flags. That's kind of not
a good idea because there's really not a
lot of nuance in those all the time. I
mean, some are just like blatant basic
things like hitting people and stuff
like that, but you just maybe need to
listen to the ick or reconnect with the
ick. Inauthenticity isn't a personality
trait. It's a safety warning. And like
the safety warning, if you see a
thunderstorm on the horizon, you don't
have to second guess with yourself or
refer to your red flags so much about a
thunderstorm to know that you're
probably going to get wet. Trust your
radar is kind of the goal. Stop asking,
"Are they nice?" and start asking, "Are
they real?" Let's play out those three
examples out in situations. Let's just
say you're on a first date with someone
that discloses way too information
upfront with you. Maybe you were on a
date with me when I was 20 cuz I used to
do that. And they're already talking
about the next date and the next plans.
And they're assuming more closeness than
there actually sort of is. They're
planning the second date before you've
even finished the first one. So many of
us have fawned to that for fear of
making them maybe feel bad or not
knowing how to say no or find our power
or find our ick. Hiding feelings or big
issues is another one. You're starting
to work a new job and the new boss never
said anything to you in any of the
interviews about you working weekends,
but here you are. Then there's quality
of relational style. Say you're a new
mom and at the first week of pickup and
drop off at a daycare, your child's
first daycare center, and another mom
just comes up to you and is like, "Watch
out for how they sugarcoat things about
their emails about peanut allergies. You
can't trust a word that they say. We're
stuck with them because we can't move.
I'm K. I formed a parent group so we can
advocate for ourselves against them if
you want to join us."
Like boom, you know, and that's their
hello to you. Would you feel safe? Would
you be wondering, do they know something
that I don't know? Peanut allergies, you
know what I mean? Like, was that
provocative or reaction seeking or them
trying to be helpful? It was provocative
and probably reaction seeking. In all
three of those examples, there's stuff
that is said up top. Does it match out
what is played out with the bottom of
the person that you get to know them
over time? I eventually had to ask
myself after a series of bad
relationships in my early 20s before
realizing I actually had a broken radar
system. and I wasn't that good at
judging people's character. Let's ask,
what do you miss in the cues or the
clues? So, trauma survivors tend to not
catch inauthenticity if they operate
from a deficit. Like I mentioned, here's
some of my deficits about why I didn't
catch red flags. Say employers with me
were not being upfront about scheduling
requirements because it was all about
their needs and not my own. I didn't
catch that because I was just desperate
and ashamed and I was just happy to be
interviewed. I would so be desperate for
a job like, "Oh my god, I'm a human
being and you would hire me from not
having a lot of selfworth. I wouldn't
care what the scheduling was or know
that it was going to mess me up."
Another example is girlfriends who were
either really, really messy or
emotionally kind of abusive. I didn't
catch that because my childhood trauma
impacted my worth and my sense of self.
I was just happy that someone was with
me and tolerating how awful I was as a
person. Let me know if you relate to
that in the comments. while also being
terrified about being abandoned. It's a
bad combination of being in a deficit.
So, my attachment wounds was taking up
all the CPU and my radar was off.
Another example is why I didn't catch
provocative weird people like that lady
in the daycare example. Due to childhood
trauma, I was incredibly naive
specifically in that everyone knew
better or knew more than me and I was
very familiar with crazy from my
provocative chaotic childhood. It's like
sort of another reason I was gullible
because I didn't trust myself and more
importantly until I got to therapy. No
one helped me see that it wasn't just
that I suck and everyone was smarter
than me, but there are actually some
really toxic people out there and they
tend to rope other people's in. That was
kind of brand new information to me. Do
you relate to any of what my deficit of
why I didn't catch any of those red
flags? like leave a comment about what
your version of your deficit was that
kept your radar system kind of offline.
Is it that you're just happy to have
some attention from somebody and that
eclipses who is giving you that
attention like with the girlfriend's
example that I mentioned. Let's recap. I
know I've talked about a lot.
Inauthentic people operate from going
too fast, hiding their feelings or
hiding big issues like having a motive
instead of wanting a sincere connection.
And the third part is the quality of
their relational style. Are they
intense? Are they helpful, negative,
provocative, something to prove,
something to sell you on? And childhood
trauma survivors can operate from
needing to be liked too much, needing to
just be tolerated cuz our self-worth is
in the tank. Not believing that we can
do better than the person who was
talking to us. Not believing that we can
know better. Not trusting ourselves that
we can spot poor character. not catching
motives because being judgy is bad and
who are we to say and we're kind of
shaky on that when judging people is
kind of crucial to to sort of survive
this world. Where can you go from here
on this? If you struggle to catch these
red flags, you're probably better at it
now in your life from when you were
younger, but if it's really something
that you don't really trust yourself on
and want to know why you miss these
things, if you want to keep working with
me on this, I created a part two
masterass video in my circle membership.
The next step there is we would be
looking at what happened to your radar
system and how to get it more online.
We're also going to work on common
abusive family issues that result in a
child not having a good radar system
online or a child not getting a chance
to figure out who is safe or not because
it's not taught. Another thing there is
going to be isolating your history
around this in your adulthood this issue
as well as your childhood. So a past and
present exploration. And there's also
going to be prompts to help you isolate
the broken radar system feelings like
I'm bad for being judgy or no one is
trustworthy in my life at this point.
That's the stuff we'll be kind of
looking at. And additionally in that
master class is like how do you turn off
those competing systems like shame and
self-doubt that overrides your radar
system in that CPU analogy. Lastly,
there's going to be some inner child
work where you practice pausing and
collecting more data on someone before
you find yourself stuck or trapped with
someone who's not good for you. So,
thanks for staying with me. You can
check out the master class link right up
here. It is very affordable. I'm moving
my longer form videos there because I've
been creating longer resources that
actually don't make it to my YouTube
audience these days. And in the creator
and YouTube community, they're not
really getting out there either. While I
love YouTube, another reason why I'm
moving longerterm videos over to Circle
is just more of a smaller community. In
the YouTube comments, they're generally
kind of okay, but they can also get
pretty nasty. We have people calling us
weak for processing this stuff or even
talking about it or arguing with us
about what is trauma and what is not.
It's kind of honestly being like at our
kitchen table with our family about
being losers for talking about this
stuff. It can get kind of toxic over
there. So, I would love a community
where that just doesn't happen and
people want to be there to work on this
stuff. So, thank you very much for
hanging out with me. I hope that this
was helpful. May you be filled with
loving kindness. May you be well. May
you be peaceful and at ease. And may you
be joyous. And I will see you next time.